Why Wall Street behind Hilary www.yantasy.com

Why Wall Street behind Hilary? U.S. stock market center: exclusive national industry sector stocks, premarket after hours, ETF, real-time quotes warrants Xinhua news agency in New York on 27 October,   finance Watch: why Wall Street behind the Xinhua News Agency reporter Hilary Li Ming although the US Democratic presidential candidate Hilary repeatedly said publicly after the election will be strictly control the financial industry, but the Wall Street is still widespread support for Hilary. In this regard, analysts pointed out that Wall Street chose to support Hilary, because it is more reluctant to let the Republican presidential candidate Trump elected. The latest data from a research institution in the United States, Wall Street hedge fund and private bonds, to support Hilary’s group and the campaign raised $41 million 210 thousand of funds, but only Trump of Wall Street’s $230 thousand donation. Wall Street billionaire Pritzker to a pro Hilary group "America first" donated $2 million 800 thousand. He has repeatedly said that he will do what he can to ensure that the last white house is Hilary, not Trump. U.S. media believes that his position represents the aspirations of most people in Wall Street today. After the 2008 financial crisis, the United States issued to implement a comprehensive, strict financial reform of the "Dodd Frank act", allowing financial institutions in a crisis resolution of large, high risk trade restrictions, to protect the interests of consumers. Hilary in accepting the nomination of the party’s presidential nomination, said it would never let the Wall Street invasion of the interests of ordinary americans. "We want to make Wall Street businesses as well as those super rich pay enough taxes," she said, "this is not because we are opposed to success, but because in the United States, the top 1% have been 90% of the income, money are concentrated into their pockets." Although Trump did not agree to split large banks, and proposed to abolish the "Dodd Frank", but he published in August this year the economic policy speech made it clear that the legal provisions should be amended accordingly, so that the fund manager in accordance with the personal income tax rate to pay the investment management expenses tax, rather than the current low tax rate. This claim is exactly the same with Hilary. It seems that neither Trump nor Hilary was elected, the US financial practitioners are able to escape the fate of a tax increase. Chief investment officer, three capital global macro hedge fund of New York University visiting professor Chen Kaifeng in an interview with Xinhua News Agency reporters said that in the traditional sense, Democrats tend to implement strict control of the financial industry, while Republicans tend to relax regulation, so the history of Wall Street has been a voting Republican candidate. However, as a dark horse in this year’s U.S. presidential election, Trump’s appearance so that Wall Street was unprepared. Chen Kaifeng believes that Trump is known for his aggressive behavior, investment banks and fund companies, he is more unpredictable, at least, has clearly set out the future reform of the U.S. financial industry, the measures of the. "Hilary’s policies continued democratic stringent regulation of Wall Street, but in the past 8 years, the financial industry has been familiar with this regulatory environment, if she is elected, the market will not experience large fluctuations, 1相关的主题文章: